2014年9月4日 星期四

Results

謝謝Jenny幫忙分析與製表!

分析的結果如下(使用之統計軟體─WINSTEPS):


一、Motor recovery (Brunnstrom stage)

(一) Persons map of items



































(二) Residual: 96.7% of the variance was explained by measures.


(三) Raw score, Rasch-Transformed score
Table 1. Raw score, Rasch-Transformed score, and Standard Error (Motor recovery-3 items)


































二、Postural control (Balance02)

(一) Persons map of items




































(二) Residual: 100% of the variance was explained by measures.

(三) Raw score, Rasch-Transformed score
Table 2. Raw score, Rasch-Transformed score, and Standard Error (Postural control 02- 4 items)





















三、Postural control (Balance03)

(一) Persons map of items






































(二) Residual: 100% of the variance was explained by measures.

(三) Table 3. Raw score, Rasch-Transformed score, and Standard Error (Postural control 03- 4 items)























四、Scatterplot




























五、Pearson's r








3 則留言:

  1. Tables 2 & 3, raw scores (0~2; 0~1) 相對應於 Rasch scores 有 disorders, 這應是 static sitting 項目有 disorders. 可 reorganize response categories (低分 categories),再分析看看。
    另或可比較 AD 的資料(因為個案較嚴重),看看disorders 的現象有無改善

    回覆刪除
  2. 謝謝老師。我將重新整理資料後,請Jenny協助分析。

    回覆刪除